![]() |
![]() GLOSSARY AND FAN FICTION INTRODUCTION - IN PROGRESS
"For centuries, our popular myths have enshrined the "romantic" or "heroic" author, conjuring new books out of nothing but his solitary genius. This image is popular with nonwriters, because many of them do not know how writing is done, and it is popular with writers, because it flatters us. It is, however, untrue. Every book, film, and song in the world draws on an existing cultural commons. Creativity rarely, if ever, means inventing something out of nothing. It means taking the scraps and shards of culture that surround us and recombining them into something new."
Added the terms:
This started out as a simple glossary, but I got completely carried away. I did, however, purposefully set out to make the definitions as exhaustive as I could, and some of the entries resemble encyclopedia entries more so than dictionary definitions. Some of these terms are Herc-Xenaverse specific, although I occasionally make reference to other fandoms, and reference other fandom's glossaries. In addition, some terms are described within the context of this site. Much of current fan lexicon has its roots in SF, and I try to trace origins when possible (also thanks to Katherine Langley). However, despite trying to recognize the histories and complexities of fandom, my definitions and interpretations are inevitably biased by my introduction to, and involvement in, post-Internet and post-media fandoms.
WARNING
THANK-YOUS
I'll get around to making up a print-friendly text version at some point.
AGoL: (also Ares GOL and AU Ares GOL)
![]()
AGoW: (also Ares GOW)
Actor-fiction: (also Actorfic and Actor Slash) Many consider this form of fiction a huge violation of the person's privacy and bad netiquette to boot. It has also been suggested, and perhaps rightly so, that actor-fic/RPS will increase the likelihood of negative attention from TPTB and lawmakers. However, as with Mary-Sues, others don't see what all the hubbub is about, or are actively opposed to the censorship of, and demonization of, people's fantasies. (It is interesting to note that slash was once considered reprehensible by many) In any case, there is lots of Actorfic on the Net (see Slate). I haven't encountered any in the Herc-Xenaverse, but supposedly it's common with fan fiction about boy bands like The Backstreet Boys and N'Sync, with Savage Garden, and with some Japanese bands. For a discussion of the complexities of the subject, see Mimi's Slash, Fiction, and Rock'n Roll: An Excursion into Actor Slash. And for another defense of RPS, see Slash Cotillion: Frequently Made Objections against RealPeopleSlash - Introductionary Ramble and Notes. See also Real People Slash (RPS)
Adult:
Adzine:
Age Statement
Alternative: (also alt and altfic)
Alternative Universe: (also Alternate Universe and AU) There are a few 'official' (or canon, if that makes any sense) versions of alternative universes in the Herc-Xenaverse, two from Hercules: The Legendary Journeys, and one excellent example from the sixth season of Xena: Warrior Princess. Concerning the Herc eps, one concerns the universe in which Hercules was never born, and where Xena was never reformed, as seen in the 'Armageddon Now' episodes (see Xena the Conqueror). The other is the universe in which Hercules became The Sovereign ('Stranger in a Strange World'), a bitter and twisted ruler who manipulates and controls god and mortal alike. It is from this second universe that we get the characters The Jester (Iolaus 2), Ares, the God of Love, Xena 2 and the competent Joxer, among others. Still, both of these examples may not follow the strict definition of the term. An alternate universe splits from canon at some point during canon, which means that the 'Stranger in a Strange World' example could be better (the universe is the same as canon up until Hercules taking the wrong path. Hercules becomes bitter and vengeful after his family's death, and doesn't start fighting for good). But the 'Stranger in a Strange World' universe is probably better described as a Parallel Universe, because that world mirrors the established canon universe, but also has major, and 'global', differences (like the gods having different roles) that were evident even before the changing-canon incident. In addition, the former universe (Armageddon Now) may be more accurately described as an Alternative History, because the only thing that has changed is that Hercules has never lived. But as Hercules has never lived, the argument could be made that the universe didn't split from canon at all, because it never was canon. Confused yet? The best example of a nice and tidy alternate universe (from 'canon' anyway *snigger*) comes from the Xena episode 'Fates Collide.' In it, Caesar manages to go back into the past and change history for his own good (or so he thinks), deciding to join up with Xena instead of breaking her legs and leaving her to die on the beach as he did in the 'real' timeline. In this new universe Xena becomes Caesar's Empress, and because of her changed path, has not become the bitter, vengeful killer who traveled to Chin. So, Xena's 'present' is completely different. She hasn't met Lao Ma, Hercules, etc. But of particular significance, she hasn't met Gabrielle (of course, she does finally meet her soulmate despite Caesar's meddling). In this new timeline it looks as if Caesar, with the considerable help of Xena, has pretty much conquered the 'known world.' Things are very different from the original timeline. What makes it an Alternative Universe? Xena has had the exact same history up until that one point that Caesar changed, and that one change consequently altered the destinies of everyone in the show's universe. It's important to note that many fan fiction writers and readers don't make these niggling distinctions, and that any story that diverges from canon is considered an AU; including stories that many Xenites would consider Über-Xena.
Angst: (also angstfic) Oh, those poor fan fiction characters. We love to torture them so! Well, at least some of us authors do. What could be more fun than having every conceivable hurdle placed before the couple we know love one another? It's so great to watch them suffer and long after one another, just so we can see how desperately they finally come (cum?) together. I know, I know, it's not everybody's bag, and there are authors who take it to an extreme we might not like, but stories that resolve a relationship in a page aren't commonly turned into films *g* (see Angst Grrls for another discussion of the joys of angst in fan fiction). There are different kinds of angst stories. A strict definition of angst might stipulate a story remaining horribly frustrating from beginning to end, whereas many angsty stories have happy endings. Also see Fluffy Angst.
Anime: "There's been an American fandom based around anime since the early 80's (one member of the Star Wars SFX team was pictured proudly holding up an original production cel from an anime called Captain Future). Before anime was available commercially, bootleg copies of shows subtitled by fans and distributed to college anime clubs and friends for free was how anime in the US was disseminated. These bootlegs, called fansubs are still produced by fans before an American company is known to have a license, or when fans feel that the American company that holds the license is not translating the show faithfully. This is not technically illegal so long as the fans do not attempt to turn a profit at it" (Alicia Ashby, Fanthropology). Akira was probably the first Japanese anime movie mass distributed in North America, a film that garnered a big cult following. Other well-known titles in North America include Ghost in the Shell, Ninja Scroll and the more-recent Spirited Away. Non-film titles include Evangelion, Slayers, . See Manga
Archive:
Archivist:
BDSM:
B & D for Bondage and Discipline
![]() These practices will be consensual, unless a warning of non-consensual sex and/or rape accompanies it (as far as this archive is concerned anyway) For a more intimate look at BDSM in the Xenaverse, see Xenadom
BNF:
BSO:
Badfic:
Bard:
Best Served, First In: Ashera's Archive follows the 'Best Served, First In' policy.
Beta:
Beta Reader: (also Beta)
Beta Version:
Beyond Über
Bondage and Discipline: (also B&D)
![]()
Bottom:
Bunny:
Canon:
Canonballed:
Challenge: (also Story Challenge)
Chanslash: (also chan) Chanslash is a term that arose pretty recently. The term 'chan' is a suffix in Japanese that is added to a name. It implies that one is younger and more innocent; sweet, even. It could be translated in English as "sweetie", "little one" and "dear." Or even something innocuous like "junior." The term became popular with the explosion of 'Star Wars: Phantom Menace' fandom, and more specifically, the published 'Jedi Apprentice' novels about the early apprenticeship of 13-year-old Obi-Wan Kenobi to Qui-Gon Jinn. Lucas based the Jedi upon the Samurai, who traditionally did have older warriors taking on a younger warrior and training him. However, what Lucas didn't address (and perhaps was not aware of) was that the Samurai warriors expected their apprentices to sexually service them in return for their training. This is similar to practices among warriors and teachers in ancient Greece, and even modern-day Africa. Many TPM slash writers have interpreted this into their understanding of Jedi tradition, hence 'chanslash stories'. Many archives will not archive chanslash stories, so they have to be specifically labeled as such for mailing lists. There are some chanslash archives out there, but most are very 'underground', due to the threat of legal action against them due to 'child pornography' issues *2. (Thanks to Trent Roman and Roanaid for this info). Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon slash can be found at Master and Apprentice.
Character Death: (also c/d)
![]()
Conqueror Stories:
Consensual:
Constructive Criticism: (also constructive feedback)
Contributor's Copy: (also Contrib Copy and Trib Copy)
Convention: (also Con) There are two general kinds of conventions:
Copyright: See Whoosh's article Copyright 101: A Brief Introduction To Copyright For Fan Fiction Writers for more info on copyright law and its relationship to fan fiction. Also see the entry for Fan Fiction for a discussion of the ethical ramifications of the ownership of cultural 'property'.
Crossover: (also XO) Common fandoms 'crossed' with the Xena and Hercules fandoms are Highlander: The Series, The Sentinel, (these fandoms are particularly true of m/m Hercules slash), the X-files, and Star Trek to a certain degree.
Derivative Fiction:
Disclaimers: (also Disclaimers and Warnings) General:
Specific to stories:
Specific to archives:
Disclaimers and Warnings are placed in the beginning of the story, in the header, and establish that the story has followed these guidelines (or deviated from them). Disclaimers are often (as the word suggests) specifically referring to the legal status of the story (or lack thereof), establishing that the story is a fannish enterprise and nothing more. Authors may also use this space to claim ownership over the story/poem and/or original characters introduced within it (see this glossary's disclaimer for an example). Warnings are often specifically referring to the content of the story, highlighting explicit material (violent and/or sexual) that may disturb some readers (see this glossary's warning to get an idea). "Fans don't profit from their borrowings, and they clearly mark their sites as unofficial to avoid consumer confusion." See Klancy7's The Disclaimer's The Thing for an example of how 'Warnings and Disclaimers' benefit everybody in the fan fiction world (but read the warnings first!).
Dominance and Submission: (also D/s) The combining of the terms 'dominance' and 'submission' connote a consensual relationship, as the absence of a submissive player would suggest merely dominance/sadism. Often found in Warlord/Slave stories, particularly Xena: The Conqueror tales in the Xenaverse. See BDSM
Domination:
Dominatrix: (also Dom or Domme)
Erotica: On the other hand, some people (including myself) think that any distinction between erotica and pornography is meaningless. It's an elitist distinction, meant to separate 'intelligent/academic' works from the base subject matter that 'common' people read and look at. As Gloria Leonard says, "The difference between pornography and erotica is lighting." See pornography
f/f:
Fan: Compare with Mundane. "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject."
Fan fiction: (also FF, fanfic, fan fic and fic) The problem with these definitions is they don't give any indication of the full scope of fan fiction. It is probably much more accurate to say that there are 'fan fictions', as all of the fan 'products' of the different fandoms, styles, preferences, orientations, etc, cannot be lumped together under one definition. Fan fiction is as diverse as any other kind of fiction. Name any popular TV show, comic, book or movie, and the chances are very good that there is fan fiction for it (see Karen Nicholas' Fan Fiction on the Net and FanFiction.Net to get a better idea of the scope of fan fiction) As for its history, fan fiction has been going on since the 70's (some even claim earlier *1), having been published in fanzines by small presses and sold at conventions, but it has gained recent prominence and popularity thanks to the Internet. Some bemoan this emergence, claiming that fan fiction's previously 'underground' status afforded it safety from copyright issues. The fact that almost any story can now be archived, regardless of writing ability, is also lamented by some (stories previously having to be accepted - and presumably edited - before publication in a fanzine back in the good ol' days). Despite these complaints, the popularity of fan fiction on the Internet has expanded fan fiction's potential readership, has opened up the joys of fan fiction to many people who wouldn't have had access otherwise, has been the basis of more than one online 'community,' and has contributed to the diversity and range of current fan works. It has also arguably contributed to the de-stigmatization of homosexual themes in popular culture. Advocates assert that fan fiction is a kind of "folk practice" (Henry Jenkins, Digital Land Grab), a reclaiming of myths and stories that monopolizing industries have appropriated from the 'public consciousness' - and subsequently profited from:
For the past century, mass media have displaced traditional folk practices and replaced them with licensed products. When we recount our fantasies, they often involve media celebrities or fictional characters. When we speak with our friends, sitcom catchphrases and advertising jingles roll off our tongues. If we are going to tell stories that reflect our cultural experiences, they will borrow heavily from the material the media companies so aggressively marketed to us. Let's face it-media culture is our culture and, as such, has become an important public resource, the reservoir out of which all future creativity will arise.
As for it's legal status, fan fiction has been ignored for the most part, although the shutting down of fan sites by Fox sent a tremor through the fan community, as did the Viacom crackdown on many Star Trek sites (and resulted in the one day strike/blackout on May 13, 2000 by some fan websites, including Whoosh!). And cease and desist orders and lawsuits do occasionally happen - some quite brutal. And as previously mentioned, fan fiction's new found prominence has opened it to increasing scrutiny by both copyright holders and pop culture critics. Why entertainment companies would want to punish their fans and shut down free advertisement boggles the mind; the same fans who almost inevitably spend large amounts of money in order to support their obsession *8. As the disclaimer on the Sith Academy so subtly puts it, The entire Star Wars universe belongs to George Lucas. The stories and artwork on these pages are meant in no way to infringe upon that copyright. Honest. Don't sue us. We have no money. We spent it all on Star Wars merchandise and repeated viewings of The Phantom Menace. Some even suggest that the whole system of copyrighting popular culture is riddled with problems, and argue that we should fight against any attempt to shut down fannish pursuits: "Americans are not mere passive consumers, dully absorbing images invented in distant corporate laboratories. We hatch our own ideas and compose our own stories, drawing on pop culture without absorbing it blindly. We should look with disfavor on any law that tells us to shut up and get back on the couch." Luckily for those of us who believe in participating creatively in our fandom, fan fiction, fan art and other fannish pursuits have been largely ignored by Renaissance Pictures and TPTB for the Xena and Hercules franchise, the hiring of former bard Melissa Good to write some scripts for Xena even suggesting their indirect support of fan activities.
Fan Fiction Hall of Shame:
Fandom: The word can also be used in an all-encompassing sense, 'fandom' as the entire world of fannish pursuits regardless of whether they're about any one particular TV show, book series, movie or whatever; the world of pop culture geeks; "I am mainly involved in Xena fandom, but I'm interested in media fandom in general." Fandoms have been compared to contagious diseases, with audiences' varying degrees of susceptibility and immunity contributing to a particular fandom's ability to spread (or how popular or large the fandom will become). As Nea from fanthropology pointed out, "Watching 6 hours of a show is like being exposed to a disease. You either catch the fandom or you are forever immune." This is related to the pimping of fandoms to others. If you try to turn a friend on to a show by taping them episodes, but they don't get hooked (or infected), then it's a failed pimp ;) For a listing of various fandoms and their abbreviations, see CFAN: A Glossary Of Fanfic Terms. Common fandom abbreviations for the Herc-Xenaverse are:
Some of the fandoms I'm into are XWP, LoTR, TPM, ENT, QAF, RD, BTVS, VOY... ;)
Fanon:
Fantasy:
Fanzine: (also zine)
Feedback:
Femslash: (also Femme Slash)
Fen:
Fetish:
Fic:
Ficcer:
Filk:
Fillo:
First Draft: (also Draft)
First Time:
Flame:
Flame War:
Fluff:
Fluffy Angst:
Flyer:
G: (also g, *g*, <g>)
Gafiate:
Gen Fen:
General: (also gen and genfic) I try not to use the term on the site because the suggestion that stories containing lesbian content are 'alternative,' and those without homosexual content are 'general' (or 'normal'), is problematic. Or to put it another way, I'm not a fan of the "and/or" philosophy, dictating that any lesbian content in a story immediately marks it as 'Alternative' (regardless of any other pairings), and that the absence of such marks it as 'General.' Despite the not unsimilar drawbacks of classifying stories using the terms lesbian, slash, and heterosexual, they at least offer more information and do not automatically negate the inclusion of other sexualities. However, if the term is used solely to indicate a lack of any adult or mature content, such as with a General (G) rating, then the classification will be used on this site.
Genre:
Hall of Shame:
Header Info: (also Story Header)
Herc-Xenaverse: When the term is used to refer specifically to the 'world' of the show (rather than the all-fandom-encompassing sense sometimes used), the term is related to the fact that Xena: Warrior Princess and Hercules: The Legendary Journeys take place in the same 'universe/timeline'. See Xenaverse.
Het:
Heterosexual: (also het)
Homodiegetic:
Homophobia:
Hurt/Comfort: (also h/c)
IDIC:
Iago:
Iago Storm:
Illo:
Incest:
Index:
Kink: LOL: (also lol)
Lemon:
Lesbian:
Letter of Comment: (also LOC)
ListDomme:
ListMommy: (also Listmom)
Listsib:
Lurker:
m/f: (or f/m - although that always makes me think of the radio)
m/m:
Mailing List:
Manga: "Americans have begun using the phrase 'manga' to denote comics published in Japan by Japanese, for a Japanese audience. Manga developed a major fan following in the United States in the mid-80's, when some companies began professionally translating the stories into English and selling them in a format identical to that used by American comic books. Some anime are based on manga, and there are some manga that are based on anime. However, the terms are not interchangeable. "The term 'manga' is often misused in modern American comics fandom to denote any comic book drawn in a style similar to one that many genre artists in Japan use. This style, generally called manga style, tends to exaggerate the physiology of the human figure in many important ways. Eyes are larger than they should properly be, noses are drawn with little detail, mouths are small and not detailed, torsos are unnaturally slimmed and legs are often lengthened. Many 'manga style' American artists also give their characters overly large hands and feet, and exaggerated hair. Character hair and eyes may be given impossible colors like pink, purple, grass green, or bright blues. Certain directorial techniques may also be used for panel-to-panel transitions, or for illustrating a character's body in motion. However, the author feels obligated to point out that no American-produced comic book can properly be called manga, and that many true manga DO NOT adhere to the style rules that are usually held to describe 'manga style' (most famous being Lone Wolf and Cub)" (Alicia Ashby, Fanthropology).
Marty Sam:
Marty Stu: (also Gary Stu and Marty Sam)
Mary-Sue: (also Self-Insertionism) The term can be used both as a descriptor for the surrogate character, and for the genre of stories that include these types of characters. However, not everyone agrees that the technique deserves the contempt it receives (see Self-Insertion and Mary-Sue-ism, The Mary Sue Society and In Defense of Mary Sue). These supporters point out that a Mary-Sue character can be effective if properly used; and they point out that many a character in the professional media is a Mary-Sue for the author. Regardless of the arguments, Mary-Sue's are still commonly written and read, and will probably exist until the end of fan fiction. Besides, without Mary-Sues we'd never have hilarious parodies like Whipple POWER!!!!! (If you suspect that you have bad writing - and web site - habits, go there to confirm your suspicions) The term originates from a 1974 Star Trek fanzine called Menagerie, in which Paula Smith wrote and published A Trekkie's Tale, featuring "Lieutenant Mary Sue, the youngest Lieutenant in fleet history--only fifteen and a half years old." As Katherine Langley says, "Paula wrote the story in response to the plethora of wish fulfillment stories that had been proliferating in Trek fandom (all author-surrogate stories, all unrealistic and unbelievable." In almost all fandoms Mary-Sue's are heterosexual stories written by women, but self-insertionism can be found in lesbian and in some slash stories as well (see Marty Stu). Many argue that most original characters introduced in fan fiction are Mary-Sues. In the Herc-Xenaverse, Mary-Sues often concern heterosexual pairings with Ares, the God of War, the author playing out 'her' fantasy with the god.
Media Fandom:
Mel/Janice: (also Mel and Janice) This genre of fan fiction started with Bat Morda's Is There A Doctor On The Dig?. These stories tend to involve a lesbian relationship between the two characters. Mel/Janice fanfic was initially referred to as Über-Xena, but is now generally considered the precursor of Über (Lunacy, The History of Xena Fan Fiction on the Internet, Whoosh!).
![]()
Mirror Universe:
Missing Scenes:
Moderator: (also Mod)
Mundane: 1. When used in the world of fandom, the term is a noun, and refers to a non-fan, or someone who is out of the loop ("He doesn't understand cause he's a mundane"); the people who turn to you and say, "What's fan fiction?" Can also specifically refer to people who are clueless about kink and BDSM. 2. "...inherited from SF fandom. A mundane is a person who is unaware of fandom, or whose awareness level is too low to make a conscious choice whether or not to partake. A mundane is not the same as a non-fan. A non-fan is someone who is aware of the existence of fandom and understands enough about fandom to make a decision whether or not to partake of it, but has consciously chosen not to pursue the fannish path. So both mundanes and non-fans do not partake of fandom, but mundanes do not partake because of lack of knowledge, and non-fans do not partake as a result of conscious choice" (Judith, Fanthropology).
MiSTing:
Neo-fan: (also Neo)
Netiquette:
Newbie: (also Newb or Noob)
News Group: (also ng)
Non-canon:
Non-consensual: (also n/c and NC)
OOC:
Original Character (OC):
POV:
PWP: Supposedly in some fandoms PWPs refer to any stories that have no plot, including short humorous vignettes (thanks Nea). But many, including myself, see the usage of the term in this way as inaccurate and misleading.
Pairings:
Parallel Universe:
Parody:
Pimping: In regards to fandom, the act of trying to turn others on to a TV show, movie, book, etc. A fan of a particular TV series might lend/make tapes for someone in the hopes that this person will become engaged in the show (unfortunately, no toasters can be won); "she's always trying to pimp Buffy on us, bringing tapes and fan fiction..."
Plot Bunny:
Point Of View: (also POV)
Pornography:
"Pornography is material designed to arouse and has no legal or consistent definition. Each person's definition depends on her upbringing, sexual preference and viewing context. One woman's "trash" may be another's treasure or boredom" (Feminists For Free Expression: Pornography)
RL:
RPS:
Rape: Sexual violence describes violence in a sexual context, one form of which could be forced intercourse (although, I tend to place the warning 'sexual violence' on stories that have particularly graphic and brutal violence in a sexual context [ex: someone is cut up with a dagger while having sex] so as to highlight 'extreme' content and to differentiate between 'rape' and potentially consensual rough sex). Sexual violence is not, by definition, non-consensual (as far as this site is concerned), but is often presented as non-consensual in stories. As for the term non-consensual, this is where I get a bit foggy. The term obviously is related to rape, as sexual intercourse that takes place without consent negates or ignores the victims 'choice'. However, if there is a circumstance in which choice cannot be established clearly, I'll lean toward labeling the story non-consensual (an example might be a 'swapped body' or 'impersonation' story, in which one character 'consents' to sex with someone they misidentify - for an example see Thamiris' This Flesh We Wear). I use 'non-consensual' or 'potentially non-consensual' when the whole subject of consent in the story is a tad blurry (perhaps if it's not clear whether the encounter is 'staged' or not . I'll also tend to use 'non-consensual' in regards to sexual situations in which intercourse itself does not take place (ie: one character gropes another), but the act is unwanted. Still, my choice to attribute one term or the other to a story is probably pretty arbitrary, so if the subject disturbs you, consider the terms 'rape' and 'non-consensual' interchangeable and avoid stories with either warning. And I am not speaking for any other sites. The definition given for non-consensual at the KSA Archive is "fic depicting rape or problematizing sexual consent in general".
Rating: You can view this site's rating guide on the submissions page. See also Actor-fiction
Round Robin: (also RR)
Sado-masochism: (also Sadism and Masochism and S&M) Often an individual will prefer one form of 'pleasure' over the other, and will seek out a person who enjoys the other role (if a person enjoys both roles, they are referred to as a switch). The dominant individual (or top) who enjoys being in control and/or is sadistic, will engage in sadomasochistic practices with a submissive person (or bottom), who enjoys being controlled and/or disciplined. The combining of the terms sadism and masochism connote a consensual relationship, as the absence of a masochistic player would suggest merely sadism. Common pairings portrayed in this light in the Herc-Xenaverse are Xena/Gabrielle (Xena as the top, Gabrielle as the bottom), Ares/Iphicles (Ares as the top, Iphicles as the bottom). See BDSM
Scat: (also scatological)
Science Fiction: (also sf, SF and Sci-fi)
Series:
Sexual Violence:
Shipper:
Shonen-ai
Slash: Some contend that only heterosexual characters can be slashed, claiming that fiction which pairs up homosexual characters should be categorized as gay or lesbian fan fic: "No need to start calling that stuff 'slash,' when it's had a perfectly good genre label of it's own for decades" (Katherine Langley, Fanthropology). Where this gets sticky is in the sexually 'slippery' world of the Xenaverse, where the whole issue of Xena and Gabrielle's canonical orientation is a subject of argument (see subtext). There most definitely needs to be a distinction made between fan fiction based around shows such as Queer as Folk, where the characters are explicitly gay and lesbian, and those fanfics based around characters who have been shown engaging in heterosexual relationships to the exclusion of any other sexual or romantic couplings (like Hercules and Iolaus, for example). But because of the often cursory nature of television, many characters' orientations are never explicitly discussed (and assuming that by definition any character is straight unless otherwise noted is heterosexist - not to mention ridiculous). There hasn't exactly been a bounty of gay and lesbian characters in popular television and film either, until perhaps just recently, so noting that a character was never canonically 'outed' doesn't mean particularly much. Still, writing popular characters in homoerotic situations can be a real 'leap' from convention and canon, and slash is often noted for it's subversive/transgressive quality; the same-sex pairing up of otherwise heterosexual characters is "subverting the text". But again, this alone cannot be used as a [signifier] because, as Katherine Langley points out, then "pairing Will with Grace would be 'slash.'"(Katherine Langley, Fanthropology). The best definition of slash would seem to be 'the pairing up of same-sex characters that are understood as heterosexual within canon.' But there are grey areas. Especially with shows such as Xena: Warrior Princess, where the sexualities of the characters are much more fluid. Black and white distinctions aren't easily made. If slash is the pairing up of characters that are strictly hetero, are Xena/Gabrielle stories slash? And what if a fan fiction story has a character that is heterosexual have a sexual relationship with a character that is gay? Is it slash or gay fic? And what about bisexual characters? Nevertheless, an intergral part of the appeal and popularity of slash is most likely a result of its subversiveness. Particularly with male/male slash, the exploding and exploiting of macho/homophobic narratives is extremely pleasurable for many writers and readers. Slash wouldn't nearly be as titillating to readers if we didn't live in a heterosexist culture. Male/male slash may also be referred to as m/m slash or just m/m.
![]() The word is usually used as a noun (ie: I like slash), but can also be used as an adjective (ie: that movie was so slashy), and a verb (ie: I'd love to see Salmoneus and Falafel slashed). I'm sure that everyone's heard the story by now, but the term started as a result of the punctuation mark / (also known as a virgule or a slant, The Practical Stylist, 1991) used to separate the paired character names, specifically the Kirk/Spock slash published in fanzines in the 70's long before the Internet (gasp!). Interesting note: The Japanese use an 'x' instead of a '/' to separate paired slash (or yaoi) characters - ie: Hiiro x Duo (source Aestheticism's Yaoi/Slash Companion Guide). Check out Ksmithares and Joxerotica for lots of Herc-Xenaverse m/m slash. Common m/m slash pairings in the Herc-Xenaverse include Hercules/Iolaus, Autolycus/Joxer, Ares/Joxer and Ares/Iphicles (pretty much Ares/anybody actually - Ares is just a big slut).
![]()
Slash Fen:
Small Press:
Smarm: In fandom, the term refers to general fic which centers on close friendships between characters, particularly in Sentinel fan fiction; "a particular variety of genfic which centers around (or at least heavily emphasizes) the intense friendship between the main characters. It usually involves verbal expressions of love and/or affection, and sometimes involves physical expressions of those feelings (this is called 'glomming')" (The Death of Smarm by Lucy, Fanfic Symposium); "fan usage of this term originated several years prior to the beginning of Sentinel fandom. Kitty Woldow (who created a Temple of Smarm web site in Sentinel fandom) is, as far as I know, the fan who coined this particular fannish usage (which in no way matches the dictionary definition of the term), back when she was in Quantum Leap fandom" (Katherine Langley).
Smut:
Songfic:
Spoiler:
Squick:
Subber:
Subtext: As for what the term refers to in the Xenaverse, ugh, where to begin... First off, when speaking of subtext in the Xena: Warrior Princess fandom, it's a singular concept. The Subtext. The simplest definition would be 'any subject matter on Xena: Warrior Princess that is implicitly or explicitly lesbian' *9. I say this because the term moved beyond it's initial [specificity] to Xena and Gabrielle, developing into an all-encompassing term that could almost be interchangeable with 'lesbian content'. One could refer to the Subtext of Minya 'coming out' as a 'thespian' on the show, or the 'subtexty' scenes between Xena and Lao Ma. Still, the term continues to be most often used in regards to Xena and Gabrielle's relationship - and to the 'are they or aren't they' debate that has dogged this fandom almost from the beginning. (Advice to anyone new to the Xenaverse: never walk up to a Xenite at a Con, or blunder into a chat room, and ask whether Xena and Gabrielle are really lesbians. You will be promptly beaten to death.) Specific to Xena and Gabrielle, the Encyclopedia Xenaica has a good definition: "Subtext can be a scene, an action, a word, a line, a touch, a look, a tone of voice or an entire episode that implies that Xena and Gabrielle have romantic/erotic love for one another" (Encyclopedia Xenaica - Subtext). Specific to fan fiction stories, "Fan fiction designated as containing SUBTEXT vary in sexual content from mild innuendo to explicit F/F sexual content" (Glossary of Terms and Legal Disclaimers, Annals of the Conqueror)
![]() Where did all this come from? There are different versions of the story, but at some point TPTB started purposefully injecting hints that Xena and Gabrielle were more than friends into different episodes around the latter half of the first season of the show (some will argue earlier, to be sure). These 'suggestions' often became insider references, involving and responding to the show's audience in a way reflective of the changing [audience participation crap]. These references also became increasingly overt, in part to satisfy fan demand and also, most likely, to maintain the media interest that had begun. One would also hope that the show's producers were genuinely interested in exploring lesbian and gay themes; there have been real signs of that, although inconsistent. The creators of the show themselves stated repeatedly that their initial interest in the 'Subtext' was just for the purpose of creating 'fun' (whatever that meant), and they continued to write in heterosexual relationships for the pair - at least for Xena anyway (although the sincerity of these heterosexual relationships became increasingly suspect). The creators also constantly [sang] the party line of 'people can interpret the show any way that they please', and 'we don't want to exclude anyone'. Fence sitting, essentially. After realizing the emotional weight that the romantic pairing up of Xena and Gabrielle carried for many fans, and perhaps realizing that callously flirting with the subject while refusing to make any commitment either way wasn't entirely appropriate, the tone of the 'hints' changed, becoming more serious and less easily 'dismissed' (as some wished to do) - although TPTB never did fully commit to Xena and Gabrielle being friends and lovers (although, they did come pretty close with the episode Soul Possession, which might have been cool if it hadn't been such a stinky episode). Nevertheless, many fans felt that the Xena/Gab love affair had become de facto well into the third season. The phrase "subtext=maintext" illustrates this sentiment. And yet, other fans focussed on other suggestions from the show and/or weren't interested in Xena and Gabrielle being more than friends. This created problems for fans *4, and contributed to an unfortunate factionalism in the fandom (with bigotry and essentialism showing their ugly heads more than a few times). To this day the term 'subtext' is a contentious one, to say the least.
![]() As for its origins, one can easily see how the generic term for 'implied content' came to define the particular 'Subtext' of Xena: Warrior Princess in fan lexicon. The lesbian content was just one kind of 'subtext' within the show's narrative, but because of all the focus it received - from fans, the media and from TPTB - it was the dominant, or the most prominent, 'subtext'. Some people bitch about the appropriation of the term in Xena fandom, and of it's perceived misuse. These people include English purists (who fail to recognize the ever changing nature of language), other newer converts to the fandom who are unaware of the term's full history, and those who perhaps object to its vagueness and its non-politicalness (or overt politicalness - see *6). The term does reflect the evolvement of 'the lesbian subject' in and around Xena: Warrior Princess. And perhaps it reflects the consistently namby pamby attitude of both the show's producers and a contingent of the show's fans, but it also carries an inside meaning and [] for die-hard fans, maybe even carrying a sentimental value. It could even be argued - although this might be too much of a stretch - that the term is an ironic strike against our heterosexist society, the tip of the 'infinite diversity' peak visible to the blinder wearing public whose ignorance and culpability is downright laughable; a public so incapable of recognizing real homosexual content, or so threatened by it, they have to call it 'subtext.' Of course, more than being laughable, that ignorance is also dangerous. And for the same reason 'Subtext' cannot remain subtext, any more than gays and lesbians can remain invisible. People die in the margins. Nevertheless, the term is a crucial part of our history as Xena fans (or at least, as online Xena fans), and perhaps will take a significant place in the history of media fandom in general *7. But then, this is all just my opinion on the subject ;)
Summary/Teaser:
Switch:
TPTB:
Top: (also Dom or Domme) From what I've heard and read, there are different types of tops and bottoms acknowledged, and there are 'pushy bottoms', but the basic rules of the relationship keep within the dom/sub framework. If anything, the bottom's 'disobedience' offers the opportunity for the top to reassert their 'authority', subsequently reinforcing their opposing roles. It's interesting to note that characters we see as dominant or strong are often the 'fuckers' in slash stories, and a big deal may be made of them being 'taken' (like Ares or Xena for example) *3.
Trekverse:
Troll:
Unresolved Sexual Tension (UST)
Uber:
Über-Xena: (also Über, Uber, Uberfic) Über fan fiction often intentionally blurs the lines between derivative and non-derivative fiction. Coined by Kym Masera Taborn of Whoosh!, the term 'Über' is a German word that means over, but that is "used in academia to refer to the fundamental essence of a concept or an idea or a character"; "An Uber-Xena story is one which takes the essence of the characters in XWP and places these in another time, another place, another reality" (Lunacy, The History of Xena Fan Fiction on the Internet, Whoosh!). These stories follow the belief that "the characters of Xena and Gabrielle [are] in fact archetypes that [can] be explored in different times and diverse cultural backgrounds" (What is this ...Über?, Whoosh.org). The exact definition of Über-Xena isn't easy to pin down, as there are more than a few variations on meaning in common usage. The simplest definition comes from Xena Online Resources: "stories about the descendants or reincarnations of Xena and Gabrielle, or about Xena and Gabrielle living in different times." Considering the proliferation of Über, it's not surprising that different genres within Uber have been identified. Many make distinction between the types of characters in Über, some considering only stories that explicitly acknowledge the main characters as reincarnations or descendants of Xena and Gabrielle as true or classic Über (see Cee's FanFic Reviews: Review Guide - Number 8). This can be understood by sorting out the history of Über, which was initially sparked by the episode 'Remember Nothing,' an episode with a narrative that suggested Xena and Gabrielle would inevitably meet up regardless of the choices they made in life (by definition, Übers and Alternative Universes are not deterministic, insofar as it regards matters separate from Xena and Gabrielle's relationship. They, in contrast, are inextricably bound by fate forever). Then came the 'The Xena Scrolls,' with its suggestion that Xena and Gabrielle have descendants (Melinda and Janice) that will also always find one another - and with its further suggestion that Xena and Gabrielle's essences live on in them in some capacity. Then the episode 'Deja Vu All Over Again' developed this theory even farther (and it has been suggested that the episode was feeding off of Über fic on the 'Net), with characters, living in the present day, that actually embodied Xena's, Gabrielle's and Joxer's souls. These characters were again examined in 'Soul Possession,' and just as weakly (IMoh-so-humbleO), which was a real shame, because these episodes were probably as close as TPTB got to making the Xena and Gabrielle love affair 100% canon (see also Subtext). To make matters even more complicated, clones of Xena and Gabrielle are set free in the present day care of the episode 'Send in the Clones,' which then begs the question, 'who's really carrying the mantle?' The descendants, reincarnates and clones of Xena and Gabrielle need to get together, have a few beers and shoot some pool ;)
![]()
Stories that are concerned with Mel and Janice are sometimes referred to as Proto-Übers, and stories with direct descendants as Classic or Canon Über (What is this ...Über?, Whoosh.org). Still, other stories developed which simply used the "archetypes...in different times and diverse cultural backgrounds" framework, with main characters who strongly resemble our heroines - physically and emotionally, but who don't necessarily have any specific relationship to Xena or Gabrielle - spelled out anyway. Then there are Beyond Über stories, those that some even consider original fiction, with characters who might only vaguely resemble Xena or Gabrielle; or stories that are no longer limited to Xena/Gabrielle archetypes. As mentioned previously, because some see reincarnation/descendant fiction as the only 'true' Über, any fiction using the archetype model would be labeled as 'Beyond Über' by these purists - regardless of resemblances. Lunacy doesn't believe that Xena and Gabrielle immortal stories (where they inhabit their original bodies in the present day) should be categorized as Uber (Lunacy's Fan Fiction Reviews - Definitions), whereas others do. It can get especially sticky when an immortal Xena or Gabrielle meets the reincarnated version of the other in a story. Is it Über? And as for the clones.... The matter of copyright infringement also clouds the issue, with some authors removing references to Xena and Gabrielle in their Über, or lessening the resemblance to the characters, specifically to avoid any legal issues which might arise out of their publishing and profiting from the work. These stories are sometimes called Post-Übers (What is this ...Über?, Whoosh.org). Speaking of which, the argument has been made that these endeavours are illegal and unethical *5. Über has become hugely fashionable in the Xenaverse, and has perhaps outstripped classic Xena/Gabrielle stories in popularity. Melissa Good's well-known Tropical Storm series falls into the broad Über category, as does SL Bowers' Lucifer Rising, BL Miller's Accidental Love, Belle Reilley's Darkness Before the Dawn and Paul Seely's and Jennifer Garza's Surfacing, among others (which, incidentally, are all available for purchase from Amazon.com). Some of the first fan fiction Übers to appear on the Internet were Bongo Bear's The Hitchhiker and Della Street's Toward the Sunset (Lunacy, The History of Xena Fan Fiction on the Internet, Whoosh!). Once restricted to lesbian work that centred on Xena and Gabrielle's characters, het and slash Über stories with a host of 'archetype' characters have begun to surface (see Jen's Regency Fuck, Thamiris' Rules of the Tragic Poet, Guerradio and The Alchemist's Dream for example). Still, traditional Über-Xena indices and reviewers have failed to recognize these stories for the most part (perhaps understandably, as the prevailing attraction of 'classic' Über fiction was its acknowledgement of the Xena/Gabrielle relationship as everlasting, and the expansion of the lesbian themes in the show). The authors of these new archetype stories may also refer to their work as Alternative Universes, rather than Über. This site uses a broad definition of 'Über' that encompasses everything from Mel/Janice to futuristic cyberpunk, and with every orientation, archetype, body (immortality), vegetable and mineral. Why? Cause it's just damn easier that way ;) See Whoosh! Über über Alles for a discussion of the definitions of the different categories of lesbian Über fiction, and the definition of Über at Lunacy's Fan Fiction Reviews - Definitions.
Uke:
Universe:
Vanilla:
Vignette:
Warlord/Slave: (also W/S)
Warnings:
Watersports: (also golden shower)
Xena the Conqueror:
Xenaverse: Estimates about the amount of Xena related sites on the Internet vary widely (varying from 600 to the thousands), but one thing is clear: Xena fandom is huge, especially online. Yahoo! ran a story in their magazine about the show in May of 1997, recognizing that "Xenites" were becoming a fierce presence on the Net (and their estimate of "at least sixty Web sites" was conservative even back then). Observers have compared the Xena fan craze to that surrounding Star Trek (perhaps meant as a dubious honor). (see Herc-Xenaverse)
Xenite:
YMMV:
Yaoi: 1. Yaoi is, in some ways, the Japanese equivalent of slash, as it is the fan created pairing up of two male characters romantically and/or sexually. But there are major differences. Yaoi is always m/m, almost always in a comic format - as opposed to pure text - and as Jeanne Johnson points out, "Most yaoi uses characters from cartoon series (anime), video games, and comics (manga), in that order" (Aestheticism's Yaoi/Slash Companion Guide). Yaoi stories/comics are considered to be largely concerned with sex, rather than plot or 'romance', much like PWP's. Yaoi usually uses an 'x' instead of a '/' to separate paired characters, e.g. Hiiro x Duo (shonen-ai uses +'s). Although, in some fandoms the characters names are combined to indicate a male/male pairing. 2."Yaoi has several significant meanings for fandom. The two most relevant will be discussed here: "'Yaoi' is a word used to describe a particular genre commonly found in both anime and manga that has no proper equivalent in the United States. The genre is generally produced by female creators for a female target audience. The content of the genre is inevitably about two men (who) have a romantic relationship with each other. Some yaoi manga and anime are what could be considered erotica or pornography, and may contain explicit sex scenes, but this is not always the case (in fact, this is not necessarily even the case most of the time). Yaoi manga are generally more common than yaoi anime, though many mainstream anime hoping to reach a female target audience will intentionally create subtext between male characters - even male characters who both may be otherwise romantically involved, or technically too young to engage in romantic relationships. "Yaoi is also used by Americans as a descriptor for certain kinds of creative works based around manga or anime. The word is pronounced 'yah-oh-ee'. Much like true yaoi manga and anime, these works usually center around two males sharing a romantic relationship, and are often produced by females for a female target audience. However, there is a larger amount of participation by gay and bisexual males in yaoi-focused fandoms in the United States than there appears to be in Japan. A yaoi fandom may produce fan comics (fan comics produced in Japan are called doujinshi, and fetch a very high price in the United States), fan art, or most often, fan fiction. The source material the fandom bases itself around may be an actual yaoi manga or anime, but more often is simply a popular mainstream genre series. Yaoi may or may not be sexually explicit. "A fan work may be classified as yaoi if the canon it is based on is true anime or manga, regardless of the nationality of the fan work's author or intended target audience. If the canon it is based on is not true anime or manga it is more properly referred to as slash. Many fans, however, incorrectly consider the two terms interchangeable and use them as such" (Alicia Ashby, Fanthropology). Conversely, some fans see the terms yaoi and slash as interchangeable. For arguments for and against, see and . Yaoi fans and writers are referred to as yaoistas. Also see yuri
Yuri:
Zine:
Zine Listing:
*1 - Henry Jenkins claims that
fan fiction can be traced back to the pulp magazines of the 1930s (Textual Poachers: Television Fans &
Participatory Culture, 1992), and others have suggested that the romantic fictions written
about Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's characters Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson were the first real
instances of fan fiction. It could
also be suggested that fan fiction has existed since the beginning of storytelling, including during times when
stories were only passed along orally. Still, I think that a distinction needs to be made between activities
in which 'anyone' can presumably participate, and the particular fan culture that has formed around 'owned'
products, fans needing to inject themselves into any interaction with a product beyond its purchase.
Or something. In any
case, the Star Trek inspired stories published in fanzines during the 70's are immediately recognizable to
the modern fan as 'fan fiction'.
*2 - Chanslashers strongly insist that their stories are not
'kiddie porn', since a 'child' is technically anyone under 13 years of
age. They feel that depicting sexually active teenagers is not in any
way obscene. The reality of life is that many teenagers are sexually
active from their mid-teen years, and often this is with adults. While
such a relationship can be abusive, chanslashers don't believe it has to be. Stories
have been written depicting both views. The Phantom Menace chanslash writers/readers
feel that in a Jedi universe where Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan would be
expected to have a sexual relationship, it would be a tender and
beautiful relationship, and something worth writing about. (Thanks to Trent Roman and Roanaid for this info)
*3 - Specific to male/male sex, classical Romans considered the role of the 'penetrator' to be respectable, and a role only earned by status, whereas the 'penetrated' wasn't respected. This was a reflection of the power of the phallus in Roman culture, and of the ideal of the 'vigorous' man. And of the more unstable status of women. How could a man be penetrated - a position so like a woman, so passive - and be respected? Roman men of status could have sex with women, boys (as long as they weren't freedmen - although, this rule could be broken), other men, or any slave regardless of gender without reproach, as long as they were always the penetrator. A man's status was best shown by his ability to stick his cock into essentially anything that he desired (see Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity, Craig A. Williams and his discussion of the 'Priapic' model). The Greek's had a different model, one of pederasty (pederastia), where youths (including future citizens) were expected to take on older male mentors - and for whom they were expected to service sexually (a model found in other cultures, particularly warlike ones). It was okay for a male to be penetrated if he was a beardless youth and didn't take too much pleasure from the act. But as he became a full citizen he was expected to take on the status of the penetrator himself. If you were an adult male (regardless of your status) who liked to be penetrated by other men you were referred to as a catamite, a derogatory label. In both Roman and Greek society an effeminate man was an abomination, a cinaedus, a 'non-man' who deserved scorn. Although, there did seem to be a certain amount of manueverability. An effeminate man in Rome who slept with many women could be mocked for his effeminacy and yet still be acknowledged and respected as a penetrator (Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity, Craig A. Williams). The ideals for women were simpler in ancient Greece and Rome: passive, compliant, loyal, receptive, modest. These were the traits expected of a daughter, a wife and a mother - the most respected roles open to women, for the most part. Again, there were always exceptions, and women could be praised for bravery, for work in medicine, for being a benefactress, etc. But essentially, the female journey from girl to woman was of much less interest to the classical historians, and perhaps was marked best by her sexual availability to suitors (usually older), as her father or male guardian would see fit. The Greeks and Romans were interested in men and citizens. Women were, at worst, sexual chattel, and at best, virginal daughters, idealized mothers, wealthy benefactresses who supported public works, and wives who reared heroes and stood behind great men (Women's Life in Greece & Rome: A Source Book in Translation, Mary R. Lefkowitz and Maureen B. Fant).
Just as with so many other cultures, it's hard to say whether misogyny or systems of social power were the dominant shapers of thought - or whether the two can even be separated. In any case, the terms 'top' and 'bottom' might reflect the actual act, but they can also reflect who has the power in the relationship. More importantly, they can reflect larger socio-political dynamics, and can thus perhaps shed some light on why it is so attractive to 'play with' and potentially subvert such roles. In any case, fan fiction is filled - as would be expected - with reflections on conventional attitudes toward sexuality and status, both critical and non.
But more often than not, these stories are not obviously subversive or conventional. For example, Xena/Gabrielle stories not always, but commonly, involve a Dominant/submissive relationship between the two. With Xena being afforded the possibly 'male' role of hero and leader, convention practically demands a weaker submissive to capitulate to her strength in sexual matters. So, when fan fiction writers move beyond the limits of the TV screen and create an explicit sexuality for Xena, it isn't surprising that she is often portrayed as the aggressor, the initiator. It further signifies her as a person of status deserving respect - a penetrator. Still, does her very positioning in this 'male' role subvert its power? Does the sex/gender of the submissive also effect its transgressive power? Is it more powerful when Xena sexually dominates a man or a woman? Or is her positioning as penetrator a capitulation in itself? Would we undermine Xena's strength by taking away her penetrative power? Can we imagine a completely submissive Xena?
*4 - Not that I'm suggesting that multiple interpretations of Xena and Gabrielle's sexuality, or of sexuality itself, is negative. The sexual ambiguity that the show often displayed was legendary, particularly in the sixth and final season, where examples of Xena and Gabrielle loving, flirting or engaging in sexual situations with men and women abound. In earlier seasons, fans would speak of subtext friendly episodes, while other episodes would be seen as very hetero-oriented. With the sixth season episode Heart of Darkness, a hodge-podge of suggestions were thrown in - and a casual viewer (without any previous 'affiliations') would almost certainly pronounce Xena and Gabrielle bisexual. This ambiguity created ample opportunity for different fantasies and desires surrounding the characters to be played out. This archive was made in the spirit of that ambiguity. Nonetheless, fans could take that ambiguity and use it in differing ways - including picking and choosing what sources from the show were 'legitimate', or debating the interpretation of dialogue or body language to death. Again, this isn't necessarily negative, but this 'picking and choosing' was often played out in a negative way. Factions sprang up around particular interpretations, battles ensuing initially on the MCA Netforum (which was in many ways the birthplace of the online Xenite community) with one group trying to demonize another, or monopolize the fandom with its understanding of the 'text'. The show's producers themselves used this ambiguity in positive and negative ways, sometimes using it as a vehicle to explore different interpretations of sexuality, and other times using it as a smokescreen to offer 'safe' content (to a homophobic sensibility), or to spew up downright fundamentalist views about sexuality, women and their bodies.
*5 - Read
*6 - "That the lesbian text of Xena is referred to as 'subtext', a subordinate ranking, ironically even by lesbians who, by not acknowledging the implications of their own use of the word unconsciously support and perpetuate society's hetero-sexism, is merely a reflection of the hetero-sexist world we live in. It is a world where heterosexual meanings are privileged and where heterosexuality is accepted in a hegemonic, common sense way as the only legitimate context within which romantic and/or sexual relations can be expressed between two people, both within cultural texts and within wider society." (Alison Ashworth, An Oasis In A Cultural Desert. Part One: Introduction And The Cultural on Whoosh!)
*7 - The term is reflective of popular culture as a whole, where the homoerotic content of many narratives have become increasingly [explicit], and although now openly acknowledged as 'subtext', will quickly become 'maintext.' The battle over whether Xena and Gabrielle are lesbians will hopefully be irrelevant very soon, as new television series, movies and other forms of mass-narrative consumption offer up a diverse selection of multi-sexual characters who say what they feel. Still, as the enormous amount of creative energy put into Xena fandom, and fan fiction in particular, makes clear, Xena and Gabrielle as characters and archetypes are eternal. For those people waging this battle for ownership of characters' sexuality, Xena and Gabrielle themselves are important now. And for those lesbians who are perhaps for the first time fighting such a battle in the public realm, it is of particular importance. The battle itself has enshrined Xena and Gabrielle as lesbian icons, regardless of what anyone wants to believe. It would be a testament to all fans, straight, gay, bi or whatever, if we could all come to be comfortable with that.
*8 - On the other hand, some skilled in legal matters have pointed out that many companies may be obligated by law to enforce their 'copyright' and 'trademark,' at the risk of losing their creative and financial control. But what is too much? At the least, the forcing of fans to remove websites which offer free resources to anyone interested in information about a fandom isn't intelligent marketing. This enforcement can be highly detrimental, even lethal, to a fandom - which will ultimately benefit no one. Ironically, entertainment companies that over-aggressively maintain copyright or quality control risk alienating the very fans that would have 'consumed' their product; punishing your most diligent fans is essentially biting the hand that feeds you. Copyright laws will continue to conflict with the changing nature of our culture and technology with ever-increasing frequency, the Napster dilemma being a prime example. But where the music being downloaded on Napster was unaltered and essentially indistinguishable from the music as it would have been purchased, fan fiction is a decidedly grayer area. Selling illegally copied episodes of Xena: Warrior Princess for profit is clearly a violation of copyright. But what about distributing non-authorized stories which are based on the show, and that use the characters owned by TPTB? Nevertheless, even some fans believe that all fan fiction is essentially copyright violation - non-profit or profit, and that any claims of fic falling under the 'fair use' provision are in error. Parody is protected by law, but fan fiction isn't parody, per se. Most fan fiction doesn't spoof the conventions of the fandom source, or ridicule the characters, places, etc. They can certainly be critical of such things, but fan fic authors, in a sense, work within the 'rules,' so as to better incorporate their creation into the universe of the fandom source. Most fan fiction authors do not want to create a reflective separation between their writing and the show, and if they do, they will signal this in the labelling of the story (Out Of Character (OOC), non-canon, alternative universe, Uber-Xena, parody, etc) in order to prepare the reader for the story's reinterpretation, or refutation, of 'canon.' And even then, readers may critisize such works as poorly written or may simply choose to call these stories original fiction.
*9 - Fans of pairings apart from Xena/Gabrielle sometimes use the term to refer to other implied relationships on Xena or Hercules, although they will tend to apply modifiers such as 'different' or 'other' (The Subtext of a Different Kind Webring) to indicate the altered focus. In any case, the initial meaning understood for the word 'Subtext' in the Xenaverse is essentially 'lesbian' or 'Xena and Gabrielle as more than friends.'
ASCEM(L) Glossary Ruth Gifford, 12/02/97 edition - ASCEM: The Home of Treksmut
DISCLAIMER:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|